How our BMW 328i picked up nearly 2 seconds with just coil-overs

Tim
Update by Tim Suddard to the BMW 328i project car
Sep 19, 2025 | BMW, Coil-overs, BMW 328i

Sponsored by

Our car needed new shocks.

A peek underneath our BMW 328i confirmed the situation: The dampers looked to be original, meaning they were nearly 15 years old and had 125,000 miles of service. While the car rode well and still handled decently, we were looking for a bit more of a premium experience.

We also knew that the BMW wanted more negative …

This content is available for GRM+ members and Grassroots Motorsports magazine subscribers only.

You can read it for free in 132 days or subscribe to GRM+ to read right now.

Subscribe now

Already a member?

Login to read

Join Free Join our community to easily find more project updates.
More Like This
Comments
David S. Wallens
David S. Wallens Editorial Director
9/19/25 11:49 a.m.

Once again, good shocks matter. 

SWGuru
SWGuru New Reader
9/19/25 2:02 p.m.

In reply to David S. Wallens :

Can't really tell if the shocks had any effect at all.  Ride height was lowered, camber increased, bump stop likely changed, and spring rate likely also increased (not mentioned in the article).  No way to know what effect the shock itself made.

jbreiner
jbreiner GRM+ Member
9/19/25 4:31 p.m.

What camber gauge do I see in the pic?

Caperix
Caperix Reader
9/20/25 8:17 a.m.

I'm surprised you did not swap in the m3 control arms/thrust arms in as well.  They will provide extra camber & caster as well.  The rear is a little more complicated but the improved lower shock mount is worth it.  Just not alot of shock options for m3 rear & non m front.  As mentioned in some of the other articles there is a decent power bump available with a junkyard intake manifold & a free 3.0 reflash.  With valvetronic bmw basically programmed a smaller cam into the 328's.

z31maniac
z31maniac MegaDork
9/20/25 9:15 a.m.
SWGuru said:

In reply to David S. Wallens :

Can't really tell if the shocks had any effect at all.  Ride height was lowered, camber increased, bump stop likely changed, and spring rate likely also increased (not mentioned in the article).  No way to know what effect the shock itself made.

The shocks were designed for that specific spring rate and application. 

With so many variables changing at once, you can literally pick any of those factors and it would be true to say you don't know what % "benefit" is due to just 1 of the variable changes. You can only really know that by changing and testing one variable at a time. 

PT_SHO
PT_SHO Reader
9/22/25 12:19 p.m.

Being among the somewhat senior crowd, I generally look at these results and say, big duh! Of course anyone who hasn't been doing this for years, they are going to get a valuable data point from the write-up. On my STI I once swapped the stock struts back in while the aftermarket set with camber plate Etc was being rebuilt. My solo storm said that in cornering I lost more than a tenth of a g at Crow's Landing. I figured that it was something on the order of one to one and a half seconds per minute loss on the autocross course. At the FIRM with the longer course and higher speeds the values you show seem realistic. 

Mousse_Upset
Mousse_Upset GRM+ Memberand New Reader
9/30/25 4:02 p.m.

These also fit E82s . . . 

How would you compare them to a Ground Control setup with custom valved Konis? 

You'll need to log in to post.

Sponsored by

GRM Ad Dept

Our Preferred Partners
baFRGtcFTen7KFLjLC14VVttPnDLtcvRJwnY9Bl22gajc3iCndQyMV5MZ8Vk3LPy